Very cool. A few random…thoughts., emphasizing broader audience relevance (noting, Google/RamBot filters can be changed, but RoshiBot seems to be Mahayana default).
Overlap:
It makes sense the RoshiBot does not go into the RamBot language, altho they could certainly overlap much more than they do. A missed opportunity, since the query emphasized ‘love’ and ‘path’ and not a specific religious tradition. That said,…
Focus:
Both prioritize their respective traditions enshrined in their software code. Maybe a bit of software conceit? ha.
Expressive:
RamBot certainly is more expressive, providing more opportunity for resonance with the audience to occur.
Brevity:
RoshiBot’s brevity does provide a few keywords for followup, but the conversion funnel (clicking thru several steps to learn more) is a drawback if we are looking at clickthru rate as a metric for engaging the audience and spreading the intent and purpose of the dharma.
Accessible to the ‘West’:
RamBot speaks in language more accessible to the west. RoshiBot’s religious term (sanskrit, mentioned twice) would either peak more interest or none at all (not being completely binary).
Attention Span:
Brevity vs. elaboration - which is best?
I suppose depends on the audience. We are told we have no attention span. I do click thru a lot myself. Reading only headlines.
While this may seem aligned with how RoshiBot responds, this does not mean I would have a clue on what question to add next. The Boddhisattva vows are a bit lofty and ambiguous, even when explored further.
Prioritizing a Spiritual Audience when Evaluating AI Bots:
Assuming visitors are genuinely interested in further discovery of the dharma, I would say the RamBot ‘wins’…More expressive. Accessible language. RamBot is more readily quasi spiritual-secular, whereas RoshiBot dives immediately into sanksrit and ‘religious’ language. That said, RamBot dives directly into an answer that prioritizes a specific guru by design.
General Impressions: the Engagement Funnel
If the audiences targeted by each AI Bot is narrow, then the above observed results/parameters is appropriate. If the intent is in a wider funnel of engagement (more interest/relevance/resonance) the language could be a deterrent.
Technology Comparisons:
I assume, by the sounds of it, Google’s AI supported additional search filters can expand and narrow the results. More robust/relevant results, I would think. With this flexibility, I would think that Google is a better platform than RoshiBot, but this assumes broad flexibility is desirable.
Dharma search?
Might be interesting to do another search on ‘What is the Dharma?’…which always eludes specific answers. ha.